This case began with the following article in the Birmingham Post on 31 December 1887
|
THE MYSTERIOUS DEATH AT TAMWORTH Mr. E. Hooper, coroner, held an inquest yesterday, at the Jolly Sailor Inn, Tamworth on the body of Mrs. Jane Sharples, the lady who was found drowned under such mysterious circumstances on Tuesday evening. It appeared that deceased left Euston Station , on Tuesday afternoon, at four o’clock, her luggage being labelled for Shrewsbury. The train arrived at Tamworth at 6.30 p.m., and deceased for some reason or other got out at Tamworth, but allowed her luggage to remain in the railway-carriage, and it was put out at Stafford. – The body was identified by Miss Margaret McNeill, of Dundee, a lady with whom deceased had arranged to spend a short vacation. She stated that deceased intended breaking her journey at Shrewsbury, so as to pay a visit to a friend, the matron of the Eye Hospital there. Last April, Mrs. Sharples went to New York, where she became connected with the Nurses’ Home, and a fortnight since she returned in the s.s. Etruria. – From the evidence of a boy named Westbury it appeared that whilst skating on Biddescote pond on Tuesday evening he heard a sound as of ice breaking, and together with a man named Pearson, who was near, went in the direction from whence the sound came. Lying on the slope of the bank, with her head in the water, was a lady, but neither of them made any effort to get her out, for fear, as they said, of falling in themselves and getting drowned, although at this spot the water is not deep. Pearson remained there while Westbury went for a police-officer, and about half an hour afterwards Police-constable George Willis arrived. With the aid of some bystanders he got deceased out, and conveyed her to the Jolly Sailor Inn. – The Coroner denounced as abhorrent the conduct of Pearson and Westbury, remarking that he was disgusted with the unmanly way in which they had behaved. – The jury returned a verdict of “Found drowned,” and at their request the Coroner called Pearson and Westbury before him, and, addressing them, said the jury desired him to express their thorough disgust at the manner in which they had behaved. The jury believed that had they done as they ought to have done – had they acted with the courage of Englishmen – this unfortunate lady might not have lost her life. The jury regretted – and he (the coroner) shared their regret – that it was not possible to punish both Pearson and Westbury for their neglect and unmanly conduct; but to show his disgust at their conduct he would disallow their expenses for attending the inquest. |
On 27 December 1887, the body of Jane Sharples, a 37-year-old nurse, was recovered from Bitterscote Pool near Tamworth. She had apparently fallen through the ice into shallow water. Her death attracted considerable attention in the contemporary press, which described it as a mysterious death and questioned the conduct of those who witnessed her predicament.
Despite the newspaper coverage, and extensive subsequent research, we have been unable to establish Jane’s birth identity, identify her husband or confidently connect her to a particular family. She remains a woman whose final journey was reported in considerable detail, but whose earlier life is still frustratingly obscure.
The inquest reports describe Jane as a professional nurse. When in England, she was associated with a nurses’ home in Bond Street, London. Unfortunately, we have found no surviving record that establishes precisely which establishment this was, and she has not been identified in the 1881 census.
Jane had spent several months (if not longer) in America. The Tamworth Herald reported that a letter dated 10 December 1887 from Mrs Dodge of Madison Avenue, New York, recommending Jane as an excellent nurse, had been found in her possession. This is valuable evidence of her professional life, although we have not identified Mrs Dodge or established the precise institution in which Jane worked.
An 1880 United States census entry for a Jane Sharples, aged 28, born in Scotland, married and working as a nurse in New York, is a possible lead.
Jane reportedly returned to England aboard the Etruria shortly before her death in December. We have examined the available passenger-list leads without finding a Jane Sharples who can be identified as the deceased.
The newspapers stated that Jane was married but was not living with her husband. His name and whereabouts were not established in the reports known to us. We have not found a marriage record that can confidently be attributed to Jane. Her maiden name, parents, birthplace and husband therefore remain unknown.
Margaret McNeill, who had known Jane for nearly ten years, told the inquest that they had corresponded regularly and that Jane’s friends were expecting her to visit Dundee. Margaret described her as cheerful, happy-natured and strictly sober. Jane’s sister, reported as Mrs Johnstone, attended her funeral at Tamworth alongside Margaret McNeil. The press described Jane’s relatives as being of high social standing in Scotland. These details suggest that Jane had personal connections in Scotland and that at least some of her family or friends remained in contact with her. However, neither Margaret’s identity nor that of Mrs Johnstone has been established beyond reasonable doubt. The commonness of the surnames and the absence of further identifying information have prevented a secure genealogical connection.
The inquest reports recorded a number of personal possessions. These included money, a gold watch and chain, rings, a brooch, two photographs, a small key and a railway ticket from London Euston to Shrewsbury. The watch bore the inscription: “C.M. to J.S., September 1886.” This appears consistent with a personal gift to Jane Sharples, but the initials C.M. do not allow us to identify the giver.
The photographs might have depicted relatives or acquaintances, but their subjects have not been identified. They cannot safely be assumed to show Jane’s family. The possessions offer tantalising glimpses of Jane’s personal relationships, but none has yet provided the link needed to establish her identity.
One of the most puzzling aspects of the case is Jane’s journey on 27 December 1887. She left London Euston on a train shortly after 4 p.m., carrying a third-class ticket to Shrewsbury. Her luggage was labelled for the onward journey and continued beyond Tamworth, reaching Stafford, where railway staff discovered that Jane had left the train earlier than expected. The reports state that a woman at Euston had seen Jane into the carriage and asked the guard to ensure that she reached Stafford safely. Why Stafford was singled out in this request is unclear, particularly when Jane’s ticket was for Shrewsbury.
Jane alighted at Tamworth at approximately 6.30 p.m. Her body was subsequently found at Bitterscote Pool, about a mile from the station. No convincing explanation was established for her leaving the train there, and the reports identify no friend or acquaintance whom she was known to be visiting locally. This unexplained change of plan is the central mystery of the case.
It is possible that Jane left the train voluntarily for a reason that was never discovered. It is also reasonable to consider whether something happened during the journey that caused her to leave, or whether she was influenced or compelled to do so. But the evidence does not establish any of these possibilities. The fact that her luggage continued to Stafford proves that her journey and her luggage became separated. It does not, by itself, prove that she was prevented from taking her luggage with her.
Ernest Westbury, aged 17, reported seeing Jane walking alone beside the pool at about 7 p.m. He said she walked up and down for a period before he heard the ice crack. He and others found her with her head and shoulders in the water, while the remainder of her body lay on or near the ice. Another witness, Thomas Riley, aged 12, also reported hearing the ice crack and a groan.
The position in which Jane was found is striking. Her feet were reportedly within about 18 inches of the bank, and the water was said to be less than three feet deep. Yet those present were reluctant to enter the water to attempt a rescue, fearing that they too might fall through the ice. Constable George Willis eventually recovered Jane’s body, but she was already dead.
The reports criticised the conduct of the bystanders, and the coroner expressed the view that Jane’s life might have been saved had assistance been given sooner. The controversy surrounding the rescue became a significant feature of the newspaper coverage.
However, the awkward position of the body does not establish how Jane entered the water. It might be consistent with an accidental fall through the ice, an attempt to regain the bank, or other circumstances that the witnesses did not observe. The position alone cannot establish that she was pushed or deliberately drowned.
The inquest examined the discovery of the body, witness accounts, Jane’s identity and possessions, and the circumstances of her journey. It exposed important unanswered questions, particularly why she had left the train at Tamworth. The newspaper accounts differ in some details of the proceedings and their description of the verdict. The verdict is reported as “found drowned” in the accounts available to us. Without the original inquest record, we should not claim more certainty about its precise wording or implications than the reports permit.
The contemporary coverage focused heavily on the failure of bystanders to rescue Jane. That issue was immediate, visible and contentious. The reports available to us do not demonstrate that the police pursued a sustained investigation into the possibility of assault or foul play. This absence of reported investigation is not proof that no further enquiries took place. Nor does it establish that the authorities believed her death suspicious. It means that we cannot reconstruct the full extent of any police investigation from the surviving newspaper evidence we have examined.
CONCLUSION
The mystery of Jane Sharples is not simply that a woman drowned in a pool on a winter evening. It is that she was travelling towards a known destination, carrying a ticket and luggage for that journey, yet left the train unexpectedly and died within a short time. The evidence gathered at the inquest did not explain why.
Her professional life, marriage and family remain largely hidden from us. The contemporary reports preserve fragments of her story but do not join them into a complete biography.
The fairest conclusion is therefore that Jane’s death was recorded as drowning, while the circumstances leading to it remain unresolved. We cannot responsibly declare it a murder, but we cannot explain the decisive events that brought her to the pool either.
For now, the case must remain open in the historical sense: not because we have proved foul play, but because the surviving evidence does not allow us to reconstruct Jane’s final journey with confidence.

Note: All images generated by ChatGPT
The Last Journey of Jane Sharples
A fictional reconstruction, by ChatGPT, inspired by the inquest reports of December 1887. The story that follows is imagined. Jane’s real thoughts, the reason she left the train at Tamworth, and the circumstances of her death remain unknown.
1. A Ticket to Shrewsbury
London Euston, Tuesday, 27 December 1887.
The station was full of smoke, steam and the restless movement of people anxious to reach their destinations before nightfall. Porters hurried between the carriages, their boots ringing against the platform, while passengers clutched parcels, shawls and leather cases against the cold.
Jane Sharples stood beside a third-class carriage, one gloved hand resting on the handle of her small travelling bag. She was thirty-seven, though the last year had left its marks upon her. Her black dress was neatly buttoned beneath a dark jacket, and a black veil fell from her hat, framing a face that might once have been described as pretty, but which now carried the tired composure of a woman accustomed to keeping her troubles to herself.
A porter had taken charge of her larger luggage: a satchel, a travelling rug and several smaller articles secured with straps. The labels bore her name and London address, and her belongings were to travel onwards to Stafford while she changed trains for Shrewsbury.
She had purchased a third-class ticket to Shrewsbury. That was what the railway officials would later establish, and it was what she had intended when she first entered the station.
Or so she had intended until that morning.
In her purse lay a little money, a few coins she had counted twice, and a folded letter from Mrs Dodge of Madison Avenue, New York. The letter was dated 10 December and praised Jane’s ability as a nurse. It was a good letter, the kind that might open a door to respectable employment. Jane had carried it carefully across the Atlantic, and since her return to England she had taken it out more than once, smoothing the creases with her thumb.
America had offered her work and a degree of independence. It had also taught her how easily a person might become a stranger in a crowded city.
She had been back only a short time. London, which she had once thought of as home, seemed to have grown less welcoming in her absence. The nurses’ home in Bond Street provided a place to stay, but not necessarily a place to belong.
She was expected in Dundee. Margaret McNeil had written that she would be glad to see her, and Jane had promised to come. They had known one another for nearly ten years, and Margaret was among the few people with whom Jane could still speak without having to explain every silence.
Yet there was another matter Jane had not mentioned in her letters.
Her marriage had become a fact of her life rather than a living relationship. She and her husband no longer shared a home, and the people who knew her in Dundee did not know where he was. Jane had grown skilled at answering questions without quite answering them.
A woman approached her as the guard called for passengers to take their seats.
“Mrs Sharples?”
Jane turned. She recognised the woman, though she had not expected to see her there.
“You are going north?” the woman asked.
“To Shrewsbury first.”
The woman glanced towards the carriage, then back at Jane. Whatever she saw in her face made her hesitate.
“You must be careful,” she said quietly.
Jane gave a small, weary smile. “I have travelled much farther than Shrewsbury.”
“That is precisely what concerns me.”
The guard opened the carriage door. The woman helped Jane up the step and spoke to him before he could move away.
“Please see that this lady reaches Stafford safely.”
The guard looked at Jane, then at the woman.
“Stafford, madam?”
“Yes. See that she gets there safely.”
Jane said nothing. The woman’s fingers briefly closed around hers, almost as though she were trying to hold her in place.
“Remember what I said,” she whispered.
Then the whistle sounded, and the woman stepped back.
Jane took her seat by the window.
She did not look out again.
2. The Journey North
The train pulled away from Euston, gathering speed through the outskirts of London. Smoke streamed past the window, and the city gave way to winter fields, bare hedgerows and small stations where figures stood waiting on cold platforms.
Jane placed her bag on her knees and rested her hands upon it.
In the pocket of her jacket was a small key tied with a piece of red ribbon. She had kept it for years. She took it out now, rubbed it between her fingers, then returned it to its place.
There were photographs among her possessions, too. She had looked at them before leaving London: a middle-aged woman seated with an infant, surrounded by four girls; another woman holding a child by the hand. The photographs belonged to an earlier chapter of her life, one she had never entirely managed to put away.
She thought of Margaret in Dundee, of the welcome she might receive, and of the questions that would follow. Had she found work? Was she well? Why had she stayed away so long? What of her husband?
Jane had rehearsed her answers, but none satisfied her.
There was a letter in her bag that she had not shown Margaret. It was not from her husband, nor from Mrs Dodge. It was from someone who had discovered that Jane was returning to England and who had made it clear that her past would not remain past simply because she crossed an ocean.
She had not told the police. She had not told her friends. She was not even certain that the letter contained a genuine threat.
But its final sentence had stayed with her.
You cannot keep your whereabouts secret for ever.
She had read it so often that she could see the words without opening the paper.
At first, Jane tried to convince herself that she was being foolish. There were thousands of people in London. A person could disappear there without effort. Yet she had noticed a man near the entrance to the station that morning, standing apart from the crowd. He might have been waiting for someone else. He might not even have looked at her.
But when she boarded the train, she thought she saw him again.
Now the countryside slipped by, and the carriage was filled with the ordinary sounds of travel: conversation, the rustle of newspapers, the clink of a bottle against glass.
Jane looked at the clock above the door.
She had time to change at Stafford and continue to Shrewsbury. She could still reach Dundee the following day. She could still sit opposite Margaret and pretend that the last few months had been no more than a long professional engagement in America.
Then the train slowed.
The name of the station was called, and Jane looked through the glass.
Tamworth.
She had no reason to be there.
Or, rather, she had one reason, which she had been trying not to acknowledge since leaving London.
She could no longer bear to sit still and wait for whatever might happen next.
3. Tamworth
Jane rose, gathered her small bag and stepped down onto the platform.
The decision seemed absurd as soon as she had made it. The train had stopped only briefly; passengers were already settling themselves for the continuation of their journey. Her larger luggage remained aboard.
She could still call after the guard. She could explain that she had made a mistake.
Instead, she stood on the platform until the train moved away, carrying her belongings towards Stafford.
She watched the last carriage disappear.
Only then did she realise how alone she was.
Tamworth was unfamiliar to her. The station lay quiet beneath the winter sky, and the late afternoon light was already fading. She asked no one for directions. She did not enter the booking office to enquire about another ticket. She walked out through the station entrance and followed the road.
Perhaps she meant to find a public house and spend an hour deciding what to do. Perhaps she hoped to discover whether the man she feared had followed her. Perhaps she had simply needed to escape the confinement of the train.
In this imagined account, she had no intention of dying.
She walked past houses and shopfronts, turning away from the busier streets. The cold worked through her gloves. Her boots struck the pavement in a steady rhythm, and the black veil at her face stirred in the wind.
She reached a lane leading towards Bitterscote Pool.
The water lay beneath a thin covering of ice. Beyond it, the trees stood bare against the fading sky. The pool was not a place of grandeur or beauty, but it offered a silence that the railway station had not.
Jane stopped at the edge.
For the first time that day, she allowed herself to think plainly.
She was tired of being asked to explain herself. Tired of living apart from a husband whose whereabouts were unknown to her friends. Tired of carrying her past from one country to another, hoping that distance might make it harmless.
If she went to Dundee, Margaret would ask questions. If she returned to London, the letter would still be waiting. If she went back to America, she would have to begin again.
She drew the letter from her pocket.
The paper had softened along its folds. She read it once more, then pressed it into her bag.
A sound came from the lane behind her.
Jane turned sharply.
There was no one there.
She waited, listening. The wind moved through the branches. Somewhere in the distance a dog barked.
She could return to the station. She could ask for help. She could tell someone what had frightened her.
But the thought of explaining everything to a stranger was almost as unbearable as the fear itself.
She walked on beside the pool.
4. The Ice
The cold had sharpened by the time Ernest Westbury passed along the pool that evening. He was seventeen and had come to skate. The ice appeared firm enough near the bank, though the water beneath it was not deep.
He noticed the woman because she seemed out of place. She walked slowly along the edge, then turned and walked back again. Her black clothes made her conspicuous against the pale ground.
He thought she might be waiting for someone.
For a quarter of an hour, Jane moved up and down the path. At one point she stopped close to the water and bent her head, as if listening.
Westbury continued with his skating.
Then came a sharp crack.
He turned.
The woman was in the water, or partly in it. Her head and shoulders had disappeared through a hole in the ice, while the rest of her body lay awkwardly against the edge.
For a moment he could not understand what he was seeing.
He heard a groan.
He called out, and others came towards the pool. A boy named Thomas Riley later recalled hearing the ice crack and a sound from the woman. Men gathered near the bank, staring down at her.
Someone shouted for help.
Frank Pearson, a labourer, approached the water. He tried to reach Jane but found himself unable to secure a hold that would allow him to pull her free. The ice shifted under his weight. He called to the others, but they hesitated, afraid of breaking through themselves.
Jane did not move.
Westbury stood helplessly on the bank. He was young, frightened and conscious that if he stepped onto the ice he might become another person in need of rescue.
The minutes passed.
At last a policeman arrived. Constable George Willis went into the water and recovered Jane’s body. By then, she was dead.
The water was shallow. Her feet had been close to the bank. The circumstances were such that the coroner would later say that her life might have been saved had someone acted sooner.
But no one could say with certainty how she had entered the pool.
Perhaps she had slipped while walking beside the ice. Perhaps she had stepped onto it, believing it safe, and fallen through. Perhaps she had been startled by someone approaching from behind.
The position of her body offered no answer.
5. The Questions Left Behind
The following day, Jane’s luggage was traced to Stafford. Her name was found on the labels, along with the ticket for Shrewsbury. Her watch and chain, rings, brooch, photographs and small key were recorded among her possessions.
The inquest brought Margaret McNeil from Dundee into the story. She identified Jane and spoke of their long friendship. She described a cheerful woman, sober and happy by nature, who had written regularly and had been expected in Scotland.
The newspapers reported the mystery of the journey and the failure of the bystanders to rescue her. They condemned the men who had stood watching while a woman drowned within reach of the bank.
But the most important question remained unanswered.
Why had Jane left the train at Tamworth?
In this fictional reconstruction, perhaps fear had driven her from the carriage. Perhaps she believed she was being followed and had hoped to mislead someone by leaving unexpectedly. Perhaps she had received a warning that made the journey to Stafford seem dangerous.
Or perhaps none of this was true. Perhaps she had left the train for a reason as ordinary as a sudden illness or a mistaken belief that she had reached her destination.
The woman who had asked the guard to see her safely to Stafford might have known something. She might have been concerned for Jane’s welfare, or she might simply have been helping an anxious traveller. Her identity was never established in the reports available to us.
And the pool kept its secret.
Jane was buried at Tamworth. Her sister, Mrs Johnstone, and Margaret McNeil attended the funeral. The newspapers described her Scottish relatives as people of high standing, but the woman herself remained difficult to trace.
Her life had crossed continents. She had worked as a nurse in America, returned to England, and set out for a reunion with an old friend. She carried a watch bearing a gift inscription, photographs of people whose identities are unknown, and a letter praising her work.
Then, on a winter evening, she left a train at a station where she had no known reason to stop.
The official finding was that Jane Sharples was drowned.
Whether she fell, whether she entered the water in confusion or distress, or whether another person played a part cannot be established from the surviving evidence.
In the end, it was not the railway ticket, the watch or the photographs that made her story a mystery.
It was the short distance between the station and the pool—and the decision, or the event, that led her to walk it.
Jane Sharples had travelled thousands of miles, yet it was the last mile of her journey that no one could explain.