Skip to content

Jane Hart

Family Historian. Genealogical Researcher.

Menu
  • Home
  • The Jemima Hartford Project
  • Jack Kirby
Menu

The Richard Evans Mystery (1876)

Posted on 27 September 202626 October 2026 by Jane

This mystery began with a newspaper report of a young man’s sudden and suspicious death but became a far-reaching investigation into a Victorian interracial relationship, family opposition, racial attitudes, a suspected poisoning, an elusive sailor father, and the unexplained details of a life pieced together from scattered records and conflicting names.

THE NEWSPAPER ARTICLE

Daily Telegraph, 18 August 1876.

MYSTERIOUS DEATH – Yesterday, Mr. W. L. Donaldson, Deputy-Coroner for the Eastern Division of Middlesex, held an inquest at the Earl of Ellesmere, Ellesmere Road, Victoria Park, to inquire into the cause of the death of Richard Sedgett Evans, aged 22, who expired under suspicious circumstances. Martha Cole, 17 Lansdowne-terrace, Grove-road, Victoria Park, stated that the deceased had lodged in her house since November last, and kept company with her sister, Mary Maria Smith, and that they were to have been married on the 6th inst., to which the mother objected, and several quarrels ensued in consequence. Deceased was a man of colour, earning a few shillings a week, her sister having an income of 3 guineas per week. All the family strongly objected to the marriage. On Thursday last he was taken ill with a pain in the chest and vomiting. Hot ginger-and-water, brandy, spirits of camphor, and mustard poultices were used, but he died the following day. Henry Hancock , 51 Sewardstone-road, East Old Ford, said that he was a companion of the deceased, and was out with him on the morning of the 7th. During conversation he said to witness that he was in fear of his life where he lodged. At nine o’clock on Saturday morning witness called for deceased, when he was informed that he was dead. Witness suggested to Mrs. Cole to have the body opened, as the death had been so sudden, but she replied that she did not like to have that done, for fear her mother might get into trouble. The coroner said after that evidence he should at once order Dr. Rogerson to make a post-mortem examination. The inquest was then adjourned.

A subsequent newspaper article reported the results of the inquest following the post-mortem.

ALLEGED DEATH BY POISONING. – The inquiry into the death of Richard Ledgett Evans, a black, aged 22, who had died at 17, Lansdowne-terrace, Grove-road, Victoria Park, was resumed yesterday by Mr. Donaldson, at the Earl of Ellesmere, Bethnal-green. On the 10th inst. the deceased was taken suddenly ill, and, becoming much worse. Dr. Rogerson, of Aberdeen-terrace, saw him a short time before his death, afterwards giving a certificate that Evans had died of disease of the heart; and the young man would have been buried, but the case reaching the ears of Mr. Burrows, the summoning officer for the district, as one of poison, he immediately stopped the funeral and sent information to the coroner. Medical evidence was now given that death was clearly owing to heart disease, and the jury returned a verdict to that effect.

THE FACTS

Richard Evans, who had been lodging with Martha Cole, and had been due to marry her sister,Mary Maria Smith, on 6 August 1876, became ill on 10 August, suffering chest pain and vomiting, and died the following day. Although a doctor had initially certified the death as heart disease, the funeral was subsequently stopped by the authorities and following a post-mortem, the death was confirmed as heart disease. This case made for an intriguing genealogical and historical mystery.

The first thing we did was to identify and confirm the identities of the key players in the mystery.

We first confirmed Richard’s identity.  His civil birth registration shows he was born Richard Lidyeat Evans on 21 March 1854 in Saint George in the East. His father was named as: James Evans, a mariner and his mother as Sarah Ann Evans formerly Cousins.

His baptism four years later, at Christ Church, Stepney, on 25 October 1858, gives his name as Richard Ledgett Evans

Other records produce further variants of his middle name Lidyeat, Ledgett, Lidiard, Sidgett and Sedgett.  His unusual name was potentially significant but remains unexplained.

Richard’s father, James Evans  established the crucial fact that he was a mariner. This opened up an entirely new line of investigation. James has proved extremely difficult to identify in the ordinary census records, which is entirely plausible for a working mariner.

We subsequently found several maritime records for men called James Evans, including a particularly intriguing James Evans on a 1870 merchant-navy crew agreement, where James Evans, age 36, was born in Bermuda. That implies a birth around 1833–34, which is perfectly compatible with being Richard’s father, who would have been about 20–21 when Richard was born. It is therefore a possible candidate, but absolutely not proven.

We also found numerous other James Evanses of roughly the right age, particularly men born in Wales, so name + age alone cannot identify him. We eventually decided that trying to chase every James Evans was becoming circular and put this strand on hold.

One of the most important discoveries was that the contemporary newspaper described Richard as “a man of colour”. This raised the question of where Richard’s African/Caribbean or other non-European ancestry might have come from. The Bermuda-born James Evans became interesting in this context because Bermuda had a substantial Black population and James was recorded as born in Bermuda. However, we were careful not to make the leap: Bermuda-born = Black. It doesn’t prove James’s ancestry or appearance. The Bermuda James remains simply a potential candidate for Richard’s father, and the racial question remains unresolved.

Richard’s mother was identified as Sarah Ann Evans, formerly Cousins. This is potentially one of the most promising avenues still open. We have not yet satisfactorily reconstructed Sarah’s own family, origins and relationship with James. Doing so might ultimately be more productive than continuing to search blindly for James Evans.

Richard’s fiancée, Mary Maria Smith was almost certainly Mary Maria Smeeth. She was the daughter of William Smeeth and Ann Freeland, and was born about 1852. In the 1871 census she was living with her widowed mother and siblings at 19 Royston Street, Bethnal Green, and was recorded as a machinist.

Her sister, Martha Smeeth married Abraham Cole, a boot finisher. Martha was the woman who was living at 17 Lansdowne Terrace when Richard died.

The Smeeth family had a strong connection with the boot/shoe trade:

  • William Smeeth was a master shoemaker
  • Abraham Cole was a boot finisher
  • Mary Smeeth was connected with boot-making/finishing occupations in later records.

This made the occupational network around Richard particularly interesting.

Mary Maria Smeeth subsequently married Walter Baines Woodhouse in November 1877.

Richard’s death certificate described him as a boot finisher, but we questioned the reliability of this. The newspaper said Richard earned only a few shillings a week, whereas Mary was said to have an income of 3 guineas aweek. Given the strong boot-making connection within the Smeeth/Cole family, it is possible that the occupation on Richard’s death certificate was incorrectly reported or confused with Mary’s occupation. We therefore treat “boot finisher” as unconfirmed, rather than as an established fact.

One of the most intriguing discoveries was Richard’s address on the marriage banns. He was recorded as living at 320 Oxford Street. This initially seemed very strange because it was a prestigious central-London commercial address, so we investigated the property.

In 1861 and 1871, Samuel Gale, an ironmonger, was occupying 320 Oxford Street. Samuel Gale was a Chippenham-born ironmonger who apparently established a substantial business there and later retired to Chippenham.

We also discovered that William R. Loftus had businesses at 146, 320 and 321 Oxford Street, dealing in specialist scientific/brewing equipment and publishing technical works. The precise transition of the premises between these businesses remains unclear, particularly in the critical period 1874–1879, after which the premises were acquired by the draper, D H Evans.

So Richard’s appearance at 320 Oxford Street in 1876 could potentially be an employment or lodging clue, but we never established exactly what Richard was doing there. This remains an open research avenue.

The second major strand of the case concerns whether Richard really died from natural causes.

To recap, the evidence established that Richard became suddenly ill on 10 August 1876. His symptoms included chest pain and vomiting. He was treated at home with a number of remedies, but he died on 11 August 1876. The doctor initially certified heart disease.

But Henry Hancock, who had been with Richard earlier that week, said Richard had told him that he was “in fear of his life where he lodged.” The subsequent inquest was sufficiently suspicious that the funeral was stopped and a post-mortem ordered. The medical evidence ultimately attributed the death to heart disease, and the jury returned that verdict.

We cannot say however that poisoning was proved. Nor can we say that the post-mortem definitively demonstrated that poisoning was impossible. The surviving newspaper account tells us that the medical evidence concluded heart disease, but doesn’t give us enough detail about the post-mortem findings to reconstruct precisely what was examined or excluded. So the poisoning theory remains unproven.

The most intriguing sentence in the original report was Martha Cole’s objection to the post-mortem: she feared “her mother might get into trouble.”

Her mother was Ann Smeeth (nee Freeland). Richard’s relationship with her daughter, Mary Maria Smeeth had apparently caused conflict because Mary’s mother objected to the relationship. They had quarrelled several times. That gives us a possible motive for suspicion, but there is no evidence proving that Ann harmed Richard. It’s an intriguing hypothesis, not a conclusion.

Finally, we located a Find a Grave memorial for Richard Sidgett Evans at Manor Park Cemetery, Forest Gate. The memorial gives 18 August 1876 as the death date, but notes that this may actually be the interment date. That fits our contemporary evidence, which establishes Richard’s death as 11 August 1876. The original burial register has not yet been examined, so this is another useful unfinished thread.

Race and Identity in Victorian London

Richard Evans’s story also provides a glimpse into the racial attitudes of Victorian London. The contemporary newspaper specifically described him as “a man of colour”, indicating that his appearance was considered sufficiently unusual or significant to be included in an account of his death. Victorian Britain was a racially hierarchical society, shaped by Britain’s expanding empire and by widespread beliefs in European superiority. Black people nevertheless formed established communities in Britain and worked in a wide variety of occupations, including the merchant navy, as well as marrying and raising families within British society. Their presence was therefore not new or unknown, although social equality certainly did not follow from their presence.

Richard’s relationship with Mary Maria Smeeth provides a more personal insight into these attitudes. Mary was a young white East London woman and the couple intended to marry, although her mother apparently strongly objected to the relationship. The case therefore illustrates the difference between the existence of interracial relationships and the social attitudes surrounding them. Racial prejudice existed alongside ordinary human relationships, friendships, employment and family life. Richard was not simply an abstract example of Victorian racial attitudes: he was a young man living in East London, earning a living, forming relationships and planning to marry. His story gives us a rare glimpse of the everyday experience of a Black man within Victorian London.

CONCLUSION

The mystery is unresolved — deliberately. But we have transformed it from a newspaper story about a suspicious death into a much richer case involving many people. And, importantly, we’ve reached the sensible point where more searching wasn’t producing proportionately more information.

THE SUMMARY IMAGE

THE IMAGINED STORY
A fictional story, created by ChatGPT, inspired by the Richard Evans mystery.
Dialogue, motives and events to create one possible explanation for Richard’s death are invented.

A Matter of Colour

Chapter One: The Man from Oxford Street

London, August 1876

Richard Lidyeat Evans had never been entirely certain where he belonged.

His father, James Evans, was a sailor, a man who belonged more to the sea than to any street or household. Richard had grown up with little knowledge of him beyond his name and his occupation. His mother, Sarah Ann, had given him the surname Evans, but of his father’s life she spoke sparingly. Sometimes Richard wondered whether she knew more than she admitted. Sometimes he suspected she had simply learned, as so many women did, to manage without a man who was rarely there.

He had been born in the East End in the spring of 1854, in a neighbourhood where ships brought men from every corner of the world. His skin marked him out to strangers, though he had never thought of himself as a curiosity. He was a Londoner. He knew the streets, the markets, the noise of the docks and the smells of the river. He knew the price of bread, the difficulty of finding steady work, and the particular humiliation of being judged before he had spoken.

Some men called him names. Others merely stared. A few, like Henry Hancock, treated him as they would any other fellow.

Richard had found work where he could. His occupation was recorded as a boot finisher, though work came and went, and his earnings were seldom enough to give him much security. He sometimes found himself at 320 Oxford Street, where the bustle of the shops and the movement of carts made him feel that London, for all its cruelties, was a place of possibility.

It was there, or perhaps in the streets nearby, that he had begun to imagine a different life.

Mary Maria Smeeth was the reason.

Mary was young, quick-witted and more determined than her quiet manner suggested. She had grown up in a family acquainted with hard work and the boot trade. Her father had been a shoemaker; her sister Martha was married to Abraham Cole, a boot finisher. Mary herself understood the exhausting business of earning money by hand.

She had first noticed Richard because he did not look away when she met his eyes.

Their courtship had not been easy. Mary’s mother, Ann, had made her objections plain. She feared gossip, disapproval and the uncertainties of a marriage that would place her daughter outside the life she had imagined for her.

“You cannot know what people will say,” Ann had warned.

Mary had answered that she was not proposing to marry the neighbours.

Ann had said nothing more, but her silence was worse than an argument.

Richard and Mary nevertheless arranged to marry on the sixth of August. They had little money, no grand plans and no illusions about life becoming easy. But they had each other, and for Richard that seemed enough.

He did not know that the marriage would never take place.

Chapter Two: A Mother’s Fear

Ann Smeeth had not always been an unkind woman.

Widowed, with children to raise and bills that arrived regardless of her circumstances, she had learned to regard security as something that must be defended. Her husband had worked hard to establish his trade, but his death had left Ann with memories, responsibilities and the constant fear that one misfortune might bring another.

She believed she was protecting Mary.

Richard was respectable enough in many respects. He was sober in his habits, industrious when work was available, and plainly devoted to her daughter. Yet Ann could not silence her anxieties. Their marriage would invite comment. Their children, if they had any, might be treated cruelly. And she feared that Mary, who could earn a good living for herself, was throwing away her prospects.

There was something else she could not admit, even to herself: Richard’s presence challenged the boundaries by which she had ordered her world.

She had been brought up to believe that certain things were simply not done. She had never needed to question those beliefs before. Now her daughter was asking her to do precisely that.

In the days before the proposed wedding, the arguments became more frequent. Mary insisted that she would marry Richard whether her mother approved or not. Ann warned that she would regret it.

Martha Cole, who had taken Richard into her household, found herself caught between the two women. She knew Ann’s temper and Mary’s stubbornness. She also knew that Richard had begun to look over his shoulder when he came into the house.

One evening, when Martha asked him what troubled him, he shook his head.

“I don’t want Mary to suffer on my account.”

“Then speak to her mother,” Martha replied.

“I have tried.”

“And?”

Richard looked at the floor.

“She says there are things a man like me cannot give her daughter.”

Martha felt anger rise in her.

“What things?”

Richard gave a weary smile.

“You know what things.”

Chapter Three: The Tenth of August

The wedding date passed without a wedding.

Richard and Mary had argued about whether they should proceed without her mother’s blessing. Mary had wanted to go ahead. Richard, fearing that their marriage would leave her estranged from her family, had persuaded her to wait.

He regretted it almost immediately.

By the tenth of August, he was troubled and restless. That morning he went out with Henry Hancock, an older companion who had come to know him well. They walked through the streets, talking about work and the future.

At one point Richard stopped.

“Henry, I don’t feel safe where I’m lodging.”

Hancock turned towards him.

“Has someone threatened you?”

“Not exactly.”

“Then what do you mean?”

Richard hesitated. He had no proof of anything. Only arguments, hostile looks and a sense that matters had gone beyond words.

“I think somebody would be glad if I were gone.”

Hancock told him not to let fear govern him. If anyone had threatened him, he should go to the police. Richard shook his head. He did not want a public quarrel. He wanted to marry Mary, find steady work and leave the trouble behind.

They parted that morning.

Later, at Martha’s house in Lansdowne Terrace, Richard complained of a sudden pain in his chest. Then came the vomiting.

Martha was alarmed. She sent for help and tried the remedies familiar to households of the time: ginger and hot water, brandy, camphor and mustard poultices. Richard grew weaker as the hours passed.

Mary arrived and knelt beside him. His face had lost its colour, and his breathing was shallow.

“Richard, you must get better,” she whispered.

He opened his eyes.

“Don’t quarrel with your mother,” he said.

“Don’t speak like that.”

“I wanted us to have a home.”

“We shall. When you’re well.”

He tried to smile, but the effort seemed to exhaust him.

By the following day, Richard was dead.

He was twenty-two years old.

Chapter Four: The Question Nobody Wanted

At first, the doctor attributed the death to heart disease. In an age before modern diagnostic tests, sudden collapse could be difficult to explain, and Richard had died after a short illness that had included chest pain and vomiting.

A death certificate was prepared.

But Henry Hancock was troubled. Richard had been in reasonable health when they were together on the tenth. His death had been sudden, and his words about fearing for his life remained in Hancock’s mind.

He went to Lansdowne Terrace and learned that the funeral was being arranged.

“I don’t believe we should bury him without knowing what happened,” he told Martha.

Martha’s face tightened.

“Why must you make trouble now?”

“Because he was my friend.”

She lowered her voice.

“Please, Henry. Leave it alone.”

“Why?”

Martha glanced towards the inner room, where Mary sat silently.

“Because my mother will suffer if this goes further.”

It was the wrong thing to say.

Hancock immediately suspected that there was something the family did not wish to have examined. He alerted the authorities, and the funeral was stopped. The coroner ordered a post-mortem, and an inquest was opened.

The newspapers took up the story. The words Alleged Death by Poisoning appeared in print, and Richard, who had struggled to be seen as an ordinary young man, became the subject of public speculation.

Ann Smeeth was terrified. She had never imagined that her family quarrels would become a matter for the coroner and the newspapers.

Mary, meanwhile, could hardly bear to hear Richard’s name spoken as if he were a problem to be solved.

She wanted justice, but she also wanted the truth, whatever it might be.

Chapter Five: The Secret

In this fictional account, the truth was more complicated than murder.

Two evenings before Richard fell ill, Ann had visited Martha’s house. She had intended to persuade Richard to abandon the marriage. Their conversation had become heated. Richard told her that he would not leave Mary simply because Ann disapproved of him.

Ann, furious and frightened, had made a threat she did not mean to carry out.

“You will bring nothing but misery upon her,” she had said. “One day, you will wish you had never come into this family.”

Richard had replied that Mary could decide her own future.

Ann left in anger.

Later that night, she regretted her words. She had not planned to harm Richard, and she had no intention of doing so. But she had made an enemy of a man who had done little more than love her daughter, and she feared that her own prejudice had made her cruel.

When Richard became ill, Ann heard of it and hurried to the house. She found him gravely sick and Martha in distress. The doctor had already been called. Ann tried to help, but Richard was beyond saving.

After his death, Martha asked her mother whether she had said anything that might be repeated at the inquest.

Ann, frightened by the possibility that her angry words might be taken as evidence of a threat, begged Martha to prevent a post-mortem.

That was the secret Martha had feared would bring her mother into trouble.

It was not a confession of murder. It was a confession of cruelty, prejudice and fear.

But the truth, when it emerged, did not make Ann innocent of everything. She had helped create the atmosphere in which Richard felt threatened, even if she had not caused his death.

Chapter Six: The Verdict

The post-mortem failed to establish poisoning. The medical evidence attributed Richard’s death to heart disease, and the jury returned that verdict.

The inquest ended, but the story did not.

Mary had lost the man she intended to marry. Ann had to live with the knowledge that her opposition had made his final days more miserable. Martha had learned that silence could look like guilt, even when it was born of fear.

Henry Hancock returned to his own life, carrying the memory of a friend who had feared for his safety and died before he could build the future he wanted.

Richard was buried at Manor Park Cemetery.

His grave did not explain his life. His father’s whereabouts remained uncertain. The strange variations in his middle name — Lidyeat, Ledgett, Lidiard, Sidgett — were left to confuse future researchers. The records preserved fragments of him: a birth registration, a baptism, a marriage bann, a death certificate and a newspaper report.

They did not preserve his voice.

In this imagined ending, Mary never learned precisely what had happened to Richard’s heart. Perhaps it had been diseased; perhaps the strain of his life had contributed to his collapse. There was no proof that anyone had poisoned him, and no honest investigator could claim otherwise.

But she understood something that the inquest could not record.

Richard had not died because he was a man of colour. He had died in a society in which his colour could make his love seem unacceptable to others, and in which a young woman might be asked to choose between the man she loved and the approval of her family.

Mary eventually married another man, as the surviving record tells us she did. Yet in this fictional telling, she kept a small paper bearing Richard’s name. She folded it carefully and placed it among her possessions, not as a relic of scandal, but as a reminder of the life they had nearly shared.

Years later, when she heard people speak of the past as though everyone had known their place and accepted it, she remembered Richard Evans.

He had wanted very little: a steady livelihood, a home, and the right to marry the woman he loved.

In Victorian London, even those modest hopes could demand more courage than they should have.

And that, perhaps, was the most enduring mystery of all.

Updated: 26 October 2026

Victorian Mysteries

  • The Adelaide Lister and Maurice Drummond Mystery (1847)
  • The George Frederick (Fritz) Weippert Mystery (1872)
  • The Esther Pay Mystery (1882)
  • The Alice Chard Mystery (1899)
  • The Jane Angus Mystery (1853)
  • The Jane Sharples Mystery (1887)
  • The Lady Pynn Mystery (1849)
  • The Elizabeth and Ann Biggs Mystery (1850)
  • The Reuben Lively Mystery (1878)
  • The Ann Carter Mystery (1883)
  • The Rosamond Ongley Mystery (1857)
  • The Violet Jane Donaldson Mystery (1888)
  • The Albert and Jane Dore Mystery (1894)
  • The Thomas Joseph Thompson Mystery (1884)
  • The Amelia Selina Phipps Mystery (1873)
  • The Bailey and Barry Mystery (1873)
  • The John Bell Mystery (1857)
  • The Ann Foot Mystery (1845)
  • The Douglas v Leon Mystery (1893)
  • The Thomas Rigby Mystery (1866)
  • The Eliza Buckingham and Reuben Willis Mystery (1867)
  • The Charles Head Mystery (1875)
  • The Edward and Ann Fenttiman Mystery (1863)
  • The William Sears Mystery (1862)
  • The Sarah Ann Love Mystery (1893)
  • The John and Anne Curtis Mystery (1850)
  • The George and Annie Augusta Loe Mystery (1870)
  • The Margaret Radford Mystery (1880)
  • The Sarah Eliza Scholes Mystery (1860)
  • The Thomas Morton Mystery (1870)
  • The Edward Jones and Elizabeth Elliott Mystery (1889)
  • The Catherine Malenoir Mystery (1895)
  • The Catherine Riordan and Dr. Bright Mystery (1896)
  • The Samuel and Mary Eastwood Mystery (1865)
  • The Anne Grace Mystery (1860)
  • The Martha Joachim Mystery (1850)
  • The Elizabeth Wynn Mystery (1843)
  • The Richard Evans Mystery (1876)
  • The Elizabeth Stanton Mystery (1849)
  • The Elizabeth Mary Edwards Mystery (1879)
  • The Thomas Wardleworth Mystery (1850)
  • About the Jemima Hartford Investigates Victorian Mysteries project
©2026 Jane Hart | Built using WordPress and Responsive Blogily theme by Superb
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT